نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار زبان و ادبیّات فارسی دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران
2 دانشیار رشتة زبان و ادبیّات فارسی دانشکده حضرت نرجس(س)، دانشگاه ولی عصر (عج) رفسنجان، رفسنجان، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
With the growth and expansion of resistance literature after the victory of the Islamic Revolution, the attention of many researchers was drawn to this literary field, paving the way for the writing of numerous scientific articles in this field. Improving the quality of these articles depends on scientific pathology and expressing their strengths and weaknesses. Articles written with a comparative approach in the field of resistance literature require more serious pathology than other articles in this field. In this study, 83 scholarly articles published in the research journals Literature of Resistance and Comparative Literature (Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman), Comparative Literature (Tarbiat Modares University), and Kavosh-Nameh-ye Adabiyat-e Tatbighi (Razi University of Kermanshah) have been examined using a descriptive-analytical method. The research findings indicate that the thematic weakness of these articles is the most important disadvantage that these articles face. Lack of a theoretical framework, lack of innovation and problem solving, unfamiliarity with the correct method of comparison and adaptation, failure to observe intercultural and international conditions, generalizations, and failure to address details are other weaknesses of these articles.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)