نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی
2 دانشیار گروه زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی
3 دانشجوی دکترای زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Feminist critics have introduced the idea of distinguishing between female and male language and are actively seeking to identify and elucidate these differences. In these investigations, attention is paid not only to the differences in the lexical, grammatical, and structural systems of female language but also to their rhetorical systems.This paper examines the validity of the claim regarding the constructed metaphors by male and female authors in Persian and Arabic (within narrative literature), focusing on the factor of "gender." To this end, one work each from two prominent Iranian male and female authors and from two Syrian male and female authors has been selected. The constructed metaphors in these authors' works are analyzed descriptively and analytically, considering gender bias, convergence, and divergence in relation to the author's gender. The findings indicate that gendered metaphors are significantly utilized in the works of three authors: Mastoor, Pirzad, and Bitar. Furthermore, despite the gender of the characters in the narratives, converging metaphors that align with the author's gender are observed in the works of Mostafa Mastoor and Pirzad. Conversely, Al-Raheb (to some extent) and Bitar exhibit a divergent approach in their use of metaphors expressed through male characters, distancing themselves from their own gender. Overall, if the names of Pirzad and Mostafa Mastoor were to be removed from their books, readers could still guess the gender of the authors by focusing on the construction and use of the metaphors.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)