The Role of Context in Comprehending Literature and Cinema, Readers’ Need-Assessment: A Comparative Study

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, English Department, Faculty of Languages and Literature, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of English Language and literature, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

Abstract

Literature and cinema, as the outermost layers of reflecting and producing social values, are not disentangled from each other. Comparative literature, as a reading strategy, compares and contrasts different readers’ comprehension of the given works in different contexts. The reader might ask himself a sequence of questions whenever he is exposed to a work, including ‘why has he chosen this particular text?’, ‘what factors have led to his current identity formation?’, ‘How has he managed to access this work?’ and, in sum, ‘how do all these factors affect his reading of the given wok?’ What is of prime importance to this research is not merely the historical and geographical situation of the production of the text; rather, it tries to assess these factors in different socio-cultural contexts with respect to the readers. Unfortunately, in the past few decades, the main attention in comparative literature has been paid to either the texts or the authors, ignoring the much more important stance of the reader. In the new era, different readers’ need-assessment alongside the creation of universalized works can be the only solution for the attraction of readers and the survival of literature and cinema.    

Keywords


Article Title [العربیة]

الأجواء المحیطة ودورها فی فهم الأدب والسینما (دراسة مقارنة فی تقییم أذواق المخاطبین)

Abstract [العربیة]

الأدب والسینما بینمها علاقة وشیجة والمخاطب لهما علی السواء. ومن هنا، القیاس لمدی فهم المخاطبین من الأعمال الأدبیة فی البیئات والمجتمعات الشتّی یجعل الأدب المقارن کفرع من القراءة الأدبیة. ویسائل المخاطب نفسه - عندما یقرأ أیّ عمل أدبی أو یتفرج علی أیّ فلم سینمائی- لماذا اختار هذا العمل الخاص من بین رکوم الکتب والأفلام الموجودة؟ وما هی العوامل الدافعة إلی هذا الاختیار؟ ومثل هذا التساؤل تلیه سلسلة من الأسئلة الفرعیة، عند الإجابة لکل ما سئل عنه. مثلاً: ما هی العوامل المؤثرة فی خلق الأجواء وتشکیل الهویة للمخاطب؟ وکیف حصل المخاطب علی هذا العمل؟ وما مدی تأثیر النتائج الناجمة عن تلـﻚ العوامل فی قراءة المخاطب للنص بین یدیه؟ ومما یحظی بالأهمیة فی هذا البحث، لیس تاریخ کتابة النص وموقعه فقط، بل هو دراسة العوامل فی ما یرتبط بالمخاطبین فی الأجواء الثقافیة والاجتماعیة المتنوعة. وقد عُنی الأدب المقارن – مع الأسف - طوال العقود الأخیرة، بالإبداعات النصیة أو بالمبدعین للأعمال غیر أنّه تناسی الضلع الأهم الثالث وهو المخاطب. إذن، یعتبر تقییم أذواق المخاطبین فی البیئات المختلفة وإبداع الأعمال المنشورة العالمیة، طریقاً وحیداً لإنقاذ الأدب والسینما واستمرار حیاتهما فی جلب المخاطب الذی توفرت له أسباب التسلیة المتعددة فی العصر الحدیث. وفی هذا المسار، یهدف البحث الحاضر إلی بیان أهمیة الأجواء المحیطة بالمخاطب فی فهمه للأعمال الأدبیة والسینمائیة، إضافة إلی ضرورة تقییم أذواق المخاطبین.

Keywords [العربیة]

  • الأجواء المحیطة
  • الأدب والسینما
  • المخاطب
  • دراسة مقارنة
  • العالمیة
Behdad, A. and D. Thomas, Eds. (2011). A Companion to Comparative Literature. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.              
Butler, A. (2010). Adolescent Ethnic and Racial Identity Development. ACT. Retrieved from: http://actforyouth.net/adolescence/ethnic_racial.cfm
Bressler, C. E. (2011). Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice (Second Printing), 5th Edition. New York: Pearson Longman Publishing.
Callaway, A. A. (2008). Women Disunited: Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale as a Critique of Feminism. Master's Theses. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.yxmy-ds98
Consciousness. (n.d.). Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved 2 Aug., 2021 from: https://cse.buffalo.edu/~rapaport/719/consciousness-oed.html                      
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity, Youth, and Crisis. New York: Norton & Co.
Foucault, M. (1967). Of Other Spaces, Utopias, and Heterotopias. Architecture/ Movement/ Continuity. Translated from the French by Jay Miskowiec.
Fromm, E .(1950). Psychology and Religion. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
Fusillo, M. (2013). Hybrid Transitions: Comparative Literature and Visual Culture. Dans Revue de Littérature Comparée, 4(3), 413-421.
Greene, G. (1986). Choice of Evils. The Women's Review of Books, 3.10,14–15. doi:10.2307/4019952JSTOR 4019952.
Heidegger, M. (1977). Question Concerning Technology, and Other Essays. New York: Harper & Row.
Her (2013). Dir. S. Jones. Warner Bros. Pictures. 
Humans, Gods and Technology: Documentary Movie (2017). Dir. R. V. Hattum. Vpro Backlight Series.
Jannidis, F. (2012). Character. The Living Handbook of Narratology, Retrieved from: https://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/node/41.html
Jay, P. (2001). Beyond Discipline? Globalization and the Future of English. PMLA, 116.1, 32-47.
Kahrazeh, Y. and A. Beidollahkhani (2021). The Role of the Popular Indian Cinema (Bollywood) in Image Construction and Nation Branding of India, Global Perception of India's Attractions. Journal of Subcontinent Researches, University of Sistan and Balouchestan. (In Persian) https://Doi.10.22111/JSR.2021.27515.1859.
Kennedy, V. (2018). "Cengiz's Changing Beliefs in The Reluctant Fundamentalist." CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 20(6): https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.3321.
LaSalle, M. (2013). Her Review: No Future in Virtual Relationship. San Francisco Chronicle, Retrieved 13 Aug., 2021.  
Lord of War (2005). Dir. A. Nicol, Starring Nicolas Cage. Saturn Films.
Marcus, L. (2008). Literature and Cinema. Modernism and its Aftermath 1918-1945. 335-358.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521820776.021.
Monk, N., M. Lindgren, S. McDonald and S. Pasfield-Neofitou, Eds. (2017). Reconstructing Identity: A Transdisciplinary Approach. California: Palgrave Macmillan.
Moretti, F. (2000). Conjectures on New World Literature. New World Review, 1, 54-68.
Oenen, G. V. (2009). Fabrication of Self: Identity Formation in the Odyssey. Cultural Values, 5.2, 221-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/14797580109367229.
Oudart, J. P. (1977). Dossier Suture: Cinema and Suture. Screen, 18.4, 35-47: https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/18.4.35 .
Prince, G. (1982). Narratology: The Form and Functioning of Narrative. Berlin: Mouton.
Radaei, S. (2013). Place in Recent Approaches of Indian Cinema. Landscape Architecture, 2, 40-50. (In Persian).
Rezapour, P. and Anushiravani, A. (2021). A Comparative Reading of Selected Cinematic Adaptations of Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman. JCL: Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, 12.23, 209-225. (In Persian).
Rouhani, S. S. (2007). Justification in Contemporary Epistemology. Religious Thought, 8.22-133-154. (In Persian).
Sajedi Saba, T. About Comparative Literature. Foreign Language Research, 17, 21-28. (In Persian).
Tavakolli Mohammadi, M. R. and M. Siyami (2020). Comparative Study of the Place's Usage and its Types in the Novel's Critique (Case Study: Hakayeh Bohar by Hana Mina and Ahl-Gharq by Moniro Ravanipour). JCL: Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, 12.22, 27-48. (In Persian).
Torkamaneh, P. and N. Maleki (2018). An Assessment of the Role of the Themes in Literature and their Applications in Comparative Literature. JCCL:Razi University of Kermanshah, 8.29, 39-53. (In Persian).
Tredinick, L. (2016). Digital Information Contexts. Translated by A. Farsi Nejhad. Tehran: Chapar. Iran Public Libraries Foundation. (In Persian).
Vafaiee, S. (2005). Place, Metaphor of an Unseen Thing: An Interview with Dr. Hossein Payandeh, Professor of Literary Theory and Criticism in Allameh Tababtabaiee Univeristy. Azma Monthly Journal, 110, 31-34. (In Persian).
Varzandeh, O., S. R. Ebrahimi and S. M. Karimi Behbahani (2011). The Comparative Role of Location and Space in Accepting Transnational Identity in Jumpa Lahir and Mehrnoush Mazarei’s Works from Postcolonial Perspective. Journal of Analysis and Criticism of Persian Language and Literature Texts, 16, 309-331. (In Persian).
Zainivand, T. (2013). Comparative Literature: From Historical-Cultural to Interdisciplinary Studies. Interdisciplinary Studies in Scoial Sciences, 5.3, 21-35. (In Persian).