A Semantic Reading of Conceptual Metaphors in the Poems of Khalil Matran and Golchin Gilani

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Arabic Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

2 Professor, Department of Arabic Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

Abstract

Based on the patterns taken form cognitive science and semantic approaches, conceptual metaphors entered the field of literature. Conceptual metaphors were the one that George Lekoff and Mark Johnson first claimed to design. There are images that determine the characteristics of the source territory and are written on the destination territory. Also, the sensory experiences that are the result of our interaction with our surroundings. This research is to examine the conceptual metaphors (directional, structural and ontological) in the poems of Khalil Matran and Golchin Gilani so as to examine the extent to which two poets have utilized this pattern. Furthermore, the orientation and direction of the two poets in using these images is to be examined as well. After examining the poems of these two poets separately, it was found that both poets have used these metaphors in their poems in an entirely balanced way, and they, by using the images from the conceptual metaphors, have equipped their poems with dynamism, continuity, and more speed in publication. A distinction to be addressed is that Khalil Matran has used these concepts to portray in all positions and directions (love, politics, homeland, ignorance, oppression, etc. However, Gilani's anthology, except in few cases, has benefited from this conceptual metaphor in portraying nature and conveying his feelings.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Article Title [العربیة]

قراءة دلالیة للاستعارات المفاهیمیة فی أشعار خلیل مطران وجولشین جیلانی

Abstract [العربیة]

على أساس أنماط العلوم المعرفیة وفی المناهج الدلالیة، دخلت الاستعارات المفاهیمیة فی مجال الأدب. الاستعارات المفاهیمیة هی تلک التی ادعى جورج لیکوف ومارک جونسون تصمیمها لأول مرة. الصور التی تحدد خصائص منطقة المصدر وتتم کتابتها فی منطقة الوجهة. التجارب الحسیة التی هی نتیجة تفاعلنا مع محیطنا. یبحث هذا البحث فی الاستعارات المفاهیمیة (الاتجاهیة والبنیویة والأنطولوجیة) فی قصائد خلیل مطران وجولشین جیلانی، بهدف دراسة مدى استخدام الشاعرین لهذا النمط، وتوجیه الشاعرین واتجاههما فی استخدام هذه الصور. لتعرف بعد فحص قصائد هذین الشاعرین بشکل منفصل، تبین أن کلا الشاعرین قد استخدما هذه الاستعارات فی قصائدهما بطریقة متوازنة تمامًا، وباستخدام الصور من الاستعارات المفاهیمیة، تتمتع قصائدهما بالدینامیکیة والاستمراریة والسرعة والتسارع. قد غفر مع الاختلاف الذی استخدمه خلیل مطران هذه المفاهیم لتصویرها فی جمیع المواقف والاتجاهات (الحب، السیاسة، الوطن، الجهل، القهر، إلخ). لکن مجولشین جیلانی، باستثناء حالات قلیلة، استفادت من هذه الاستعارة المفاهیمیة فی تصویر الطبیعة ونقل مشاعره.

Keywords [العربیة]

  • العلوم المعرفیة
  • الاستعارة المفاهیمیة
  • الأدب العربی
  • الأدب الفارسی
  • خلیل مطران
  • جولشین جیلانی
Abedi, K. (2001). With the song "Rain of Life" and poetry by Golchin Gilani. First Edition. Tehran: Third publication (In Persian).
Afarashi, A., Hosami, T., Salas, B. (2013). Examining directional conceptual metaphors in Spanish and Persian languages. Comparative Language and Literature Research Quarterly, 4 (12), 1-23 (In Persian).
Al-Fakhoury, H. (1986). The mosque in the history of modern Arabic literature. First edition. Beirut: Dar Al-Jil publications (In Arabic).
Barcelona, A. (2012). Cognitive theory about metaphor and permission". Translated by Tina Amr Allahi. In: Permitted metaphor with a cognitive approach. Tehran: Naqsh Jahan (In Persian).
Dashti, M. (2015). Those days, a reflection on childhood in the works of Nima, Golchin Gilani, Forough Sepehr. Journal of Literary Sciences, 1 (2), 89-111 (In Persian).
Deir Moghadam, M. (2005). Theoretical linguistics. Tehran: Samt Publications (In Persian).
Evans, V., Green, M. (2006) cognitive linguistics: An lntroduction. Edinburgh. University press.
Fatuhi, M. (2006). Romantic image of theoretical foundations, nature and function. Journal of Literary Research, 3 (9), 151-180 (In Persian).
Gandhamkar, R. (2008). Semantic investigation of compound foundational verbs in Persian language, a cognitive approach. Master's Thesis in Public Linguistics, Tehran: Allameh Tabatabai University (In Persian).
Geeraerts, D. (1995). Cognitive linguistics: Handbook of pragmatics. Amsterdam: J. benjamin pub.co.
Gibbs, R. W., Steen, G. J. (Eds), (1997). Metaphor in conitive linguistic, Selected papers from the fifth international cognitive linguistics conference. Amsterdam: jhon benjamins.
Gilani, G. (2011). A collection of Gilani poems. Rasht: Ilya Publications (In Persian).
Grady, J. E. (2007). Metaphor in the oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics. D. Geeraerts, H. Cuyckens. Oxford, oxford university press.
Harirchi, F., Mohammadi, M. (2009). Romantic manifestations in the poems of Khalil Matran. Journal: Literary Sciences, (5), 45-99 (In Persian).
Johanson, M. (1987). The body in the mined: the bodily basis of reason and imagination. Chicago: university of Chicago press.
Kovecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor, practicalintroduction. Oxford, oxford university press.
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A Practical introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Krippendorff, K. (1993). Major metaphors of communication and some reflections on their use. Cybernetics and human knowing, 2 (1), 3-25.constructivis
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. in geeraerts, dirk (ED.). (2006) cognitive linguistics: basic reading, (cognitive linguistics research: 34), mouton de gruyter berlin, New York, 185-238
Lakoff, G., Johanson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago university press.
Lakoff, G., Johnsen, M. (1980) The Metaphorical Structure of the Human Conceptula System. In Cognitive Scinece. 4, 195-208.
Lakoff, G., Johnsen, M. (2003) Metaphors we live by. London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lobner, S. (2002). Understanding Semantics. London: Arnold
Mutran, Kh. (1977). Divan Al-Khalil. Beirut: Darmaroon Abboud Publications (In Arabic).
Ortiz Díaz Guerra, M. J. (2009). La Metáfora Visual Incorporada: Aplicación de la Teoría Integrada de la Metáfora Primaria a UN corpus audiovisual. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante, Departamento de Comunicación y Psicología Social.
Raskhmohand, M. (2014). An introduction to cognitive linguistics, theories and concepts; Fourth edition. Tehran: Samt Publications (In Persian).
Richards, S. (2003). metaphors in expert and common-sense reasoning.in zelinsky-wibbelt (ED). Consepts (pp.243-298). The hague: mouton de gruyter.
Safavi, K. (2001). An introduction to semantics. Tehran: Research Institution for Culture and Art (In Persian).
Salimi, A., Salimi, F. (2011). A comparative study of image in nature in the poetry of Nima Yoshij and Khalil Matran. Master's Thesis of Arabic Language and Literature, Kermanshah: Razi University (In Persian).
Salimi, A., Salimi, F. (2018). A comparative study of the "lion" symbol in Nimayoshij and Khalil Matran's poetry. Comparative Literature Review (Former Criticism and Comparative Literature), 1 (2), 65-98 (In Persian).
Salimi, A., Yari, B. (2014). Comparative comparison of the narrative poetry of Nima Yoshij and Khalil Matran reflecting on the level of artistic creativity of the two poets. Journal of Literary Criticism and Rhetorics, 3 (2), 156-198 (In Persian).
Shakib Ansari, M. (2006). Evolution of contemporary Arabic literature. 4th edition, Shahid Chamran Committee, Ahvaz (In Arabic).
Suleimanpour, Z., Zarkob, M. (2015). Al-Marah in the poetry of Khalil Matran. Journal of research in Arabic language and manners, (11), 57-70 (In Arabic).
Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: metaphoica and cultural aspects off semantic structure.cambridge: Cambridge university press.